Dec. 2nd, 2005

sam_t: (Default)
There's a Holiday meme going round in which people give a list of a few things they're wishing for. I think this is an excellent idea - it's interesting to watch, and there's always the chance that something you want is the same thing that someone else is about to throw out - but I just can't do it myself. For a start, I can't think of many things I want that aren't either already on my christmas list with family and friends or utterly impractical, and for another thing I just can't get over the cultural conditioning Not To Ask for things (Christmas lists being a special case). So, here's my version:

Utterly Impractical Wishes )

Actually, combining aspects of another meme that's going round at the moment, if anyone would like to imagine what they'd do with me if I were magically able to drop in for a flying visit, I would be most grateful. This afternoon is shaping up to be long and boring.

And, come to think of it, something else it's possible to ask for: music recommendations. My taste is pretty eclectic but my knowledge is patchy.

Categories

Dec. 2nd, 2005 05:33 pm
sam_t: (Default)
There seems to be a lot of discussion about defining the terms 'Science Fiction' and 'Fantasy' going on at the moment: see [livejournal.com profile] matociquala here and here, [livejournal.com profile] papersky here and probably some other places I've forgotten, as well as all the arguments linked to in those posts. This reminds me very strongly of the term I did Philosophical Aesthetics and spent at least two hours a week discussing what someone thought Art was. Two arguments that I haven't spotted yet in this discussion are:

1. The idea that something is Fantasy if someone in the Fantasy World (Fantasy author, Fantasy publisher, Fantasy critic) says it is. I can't remember whose idea this was, but I suspect that something like this gets used a lot in places where this discussion isn't happening, for example, among harassed book-shelving people in bookshops where SF and F are shelved separately. Unfortunately, it's not a lot of help for critical discussion and creates the further problem of making people decide which World they're going to be in today.

2. Wittgenstein's categories, where there isn't a definition as such but a fuzzy idea based on comparison, and 'Science Fiction' and 'Fantasy' would change slowly as new works appear.

I've been thinking about the categories in a vague sort of way as 'Science Fiction'='a story which could take place in the known universe or makes a case for being so' and 'Fantasy'='A story which couldn't". This is rather simplistic, however. Mostly, I just think of sf&f as a single category with two marketing-induced poles - the term 'speculative fiction' is handy - and don't look at it too closely. I'm aware of not having read enough in either 'category' to start theorising with any authority. I'm enjoying the discussion, though.

ETA: Further links on the genre debate.
[livejournal.com profile] sartorias here and [livejournal.com profile] matociquala here, here and here.

Profile

sam_t: (Default)
sam_t

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 12:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios